<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>da.rryl.me &#187; Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://da.rryl.me/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://da.rryl.me</link>
	<description>Theology, Technology and Christian Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:32:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>C. S. Lewis&#8217;s conversion from atheism</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2012/c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2012/c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism/" title="C. S. Lewis&#039;s conversion from atheism"></a>C. S. Lewis traces his conversion story through his autobiography “Surprised by Joy” from his early childhood through to his conversion to Christ as an adult. As the story unfolds, he traces the “aesthetic experience” of “joy” as an experience that &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2012/c-s-lewis-conversion-from-atheism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playtime is over</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2012/playtime-is-over/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=playtime-is-over</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2012/playtime-is-over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christian Living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/playtime-is-over/" title="Playtime is over"></a>Via Christian Apologetics. This is a good quote from William Lane Craig. Apologetics is note the lone answer to the difficulties facing the church (and I don&#8217;t think Craig would agree say it is), but certainly churches need to be &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/playtime-is-over/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2012/playtime-is-over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Issues with Theistic evolution</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2012/issues-with-theistic-evolution/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=issues-with-theistic-evolution</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2012/issues-with-theistic-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/issues-with-theistic-evolution/" title="Issues with Theistic evolution"></a>I&#8217;ve previously expressed my reservations about theistic evolution.  Recently, I was interested to hear some new reasoning against it in this interview with Jay Richards Jay Richards (who co-wrote the Privileged Planet) has recently edited a book (God and Evolution) &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2012/issues-with-theistic-evolution/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2012/issues-with-theistic-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triablogue: What motivates science</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/triablogue-what-motivates-science/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=triablogue-what-motivates-science</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/triablogue-what-motivates-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/triablogue-what-motivates-science/" title="Triablogue: What motivates science"></a>Good post summarizing science and Christianity. In Christianity, greater intelligence produces lesser intelligence. In atheism, unintelligence produces intelligence. Which is more intrinsically interesting? Worth a read… Triablogue: What motivates science]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/triablogue-what-motivates-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over half of NZers believe in psychics</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics/" title="Over half of NZers believe in psychics"></a>Over half of NZers believe in psychics &#8211; National &#8211; NZ Herald News Interesting to see that there are still significant numbers of kiwis who believe that there is more to this world than the natural world.  Which reminds me, &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/over-half-of-nzers-believe-in-psychics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dawkins vs. Craig &#8211; a mismatch?</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://da.rryl.me/?p=335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch/" title="Dawkins vs. Craig - a mismatch?"></a>I was interested to read this post by Edward Feser regarding Dawkins &#8220;forgetting&#8221; he&#8217;d not debated William Lane Craig. One of the comments led to this post which defended Dawkins&#8217; refusal to debate Craig.  The argument from this author was &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/dawkins-vs-craig-a-mismatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why God gave instruction to man at creation</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bible.geek.nz/?p=299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation/" title="Why God gave instruction to man at creation"></a>From &#8220;Instruments in the redeemers hands&#8221; by Paul Tripp, p39-41 (the entire book is assigned reading for this week). In explaining Genesis 1:26-28 Tripp makes the point that there is something unique about God stopping and actually speaking to the &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/why-god-gave-instruction-to-man-at-creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The non-scientific foundations of science</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 13:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bible.geek.nz/?p=294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science/" title="The non-scientific foundations of science"></a>There are so many today who believe that science is the one form of truth of which we can be sure. You hear it all the time. If the scientists say it is so, it must be. It is even &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/the-non-scientific-foundations-of-science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Atheisms poor theology</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2011/atheisms-poor-theology/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=atheisms-poor-theology</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2011/atheisms-poor-theology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 22:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bible.geek.nz/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/atheisms-poor-theology/" title="Atheisms poor theology"></a>Militant Atheism.&#160; Those calling themselves by this title not only refuse, but also openly attack religion &#8211; specifically Christianity.&#160; However, when we examine the arguments they use to reject submission to God and vilify Christianity we find their understanding about &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2011/atheisms-poor-theology/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2011/atheisms-poor-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to find the truth</title>
		<link>http://da.rryl.me/2009/how-to-find-the-truth/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-find-the-truth</link>
		<comments>http://da.rryl.me/2009/how-to-find-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/post/2009/12/13/How-to-find-the-truth.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://da.rryl.me/2009/how-to-find-the-truth/" title="How to find the truth"></a>I came across this comment on this thread.&#160; I’ve come across it a bit recently, so I thought I’d post on it here. &#34;I am a seeker of truth and if you have the truth I will get to it &#8230;<p class="read-more"><a href="http://da.rryl.me/2009/how-to-find-the-truth/">Read more &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://da.rryl.me/2009/how-to-find-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

